⚡ Emergence v2
BIS —
MAC —
Pain —
Emerg —
6h 00m
Demographics
Premedications (time since given → reduces emergence)
Calculated Metrics
LBM
kg
BMI
Pain tier
Apfel
/4
PONV risk
%
Premed burden
Enter patient demographics and confirm.
Anesthesia Timing
Case duration
min
Time elapsed
min
Volatile Agent
Maintenance 1.00 × MAC
N₂O concentration 0%
MAC Calculations — All Models
MAC_age = MAC₄₀ × 10^[−0.00269×(age−40)] Mapleson 1996
MAC_temp = MAC_age × 10^[−0.00269×(37−T)] Lerou 2004
F_total = ET_vol/MAC_eff + ET_N₂O/MAC_N₂O Becker 2008
MAC-awake: sevo 0.34×, des 0.33×, iso 0.40× Torri 2004
MAC_eff
%
MAC-awake
%
F_total
MAC
CSHT
min
Alveolar Washout Curve
Mapleson 1996 · Eger 1974 · Nickalls & Mapleson 2003
N₂O Effects
MAC sparing
0 %
Diffusion hypoxia
None
PONV multiplier
×1.0
N₂O not selected.
Peyton 2011 · Tramèr 1996 · Becker 2008
💉 Propofol
Target Ce 3.0 mcg/mL
All models — Ce at current target (range shows inter-model variability)
Prop Ce
mcg/mL
Pred. BIS
Prop ke0
min⁻¹
CSHT prop
min
Marsh 1991 · Schnider 1998 · Eleveld 2018 · Cortínez 2010 · Kern 2004 RSM
💉 Etomidate
Residual Ce
t½ = 2–5h · Vd = 4.5 L/kg · F = 1.0 IV · Adrenocortical suppression flag if dose >0.3 mg/kg
Forman SA. Anesthesiology 2011 · Van Hamme 1978
💉 Ketamine
Plasma Ce
ng/mL
Hijazi Y. Anesthesiology 2003 · Olofsen E. Br J Anaesth 2012 · Geisslinger 1995
🩸 Remifentanil
Target 2.0 ng/mL
Minto vs Eleveld vs Kim — Ce estimates
Cl₁ (Minto)
Css
ng/mL
Ce stop
ng/mL
T safe
min
Drive
%
Ce Decay Curve
Minto 1997 · Eleveld 2017 · Kim 2017 · Ce50_resp = 1.17 ng/mL · CSHT = 3.5 min
🩸 Fentanyl
Ce (ng/mL)
CSHT
min
T to safe
Resp drive
%
Shafer 1990 · Stanski 1984 · Ginsberg 1996 · Youngs & Shafer 1992 (CSHT)
🩸 Sufentanil
Ce target 0.3 ng/mL
Ce (ng/mL)
CSHT
min
T to safe
Resp drive
%
Bovill 1984 · Gepts 1995 · Greeley 1987 · ke0 = 0.119 min⁻¹ · CSHT 30–60 min
🩸 Morphine
Ce plasma
ng/mL
M6G flag
Resp drive
%
t½ = 2–4h · Vd = 3.5 L/kg · Active metabolite M6G accumulates in renal failure — flags when creatinine entered
Lotsch J. Clin Pharmacokinet 2005 · Osborne R. BMJ 1990
💊 Dexmedetomidine
Ce (ng/mL)
⚠ Dexmedetomidine = AROUSABLE sedation. BIS less predictive. Sympatholysis persists beyond sedation offset.
MAC-sparing: 30–40% (Bhana 2000). ke0 = 0.20 min⁻¹
Colin 2017 · Hannivoort 2015 · Weerink 2017 · Bhana N. Drugs 2000
💊 Lidocaine IV
Opioid-sparing 20–30% · Pain score −1.5 · NNT=4 for opioid reduction
Toxicity threshold: plasma >5 mcg/mL
Kranke P. Cochrane 2015 · Vigneault L. Cochrane 2011
💊 Ketamine — Sub-anaesthetic (Opioid-sparing)
Opioid-sparing 30–40% · ⚠ Emergence agitation flag if Ce >200 ng/mL · Psychomimetic effects at >1 mg/kg
Jouguelet-Lacoste 2015 · Bell RF. Cochrane 2006
💊 Other Adjuvants
Combined opioid sparing
%
Albrecht 2013 (Mg) · Apfel 2004 (Dexa) · McNicol 2011 (Paracetamol) · Ong 2010 (NSAIDs)
Neuraxial Blocks
Epidural
Spinal
Peripheral Nerve Blocks
Block Effects on Emergence
Pain reduction
Opioid sparing
%
Block duration
h
Fredrickson 2010 · Paul 2010 · Petersen 2010 · Forero 2016 · Davies 2006
NMB Agent
Est. TOFR
1.00
Wait time
TOF Status
T1
T2
T3
T4
00.70.91.0
Extubation gate
Magnesium
No interaction
TOFR ≥ 0.90 = safe extubation (adductor pollicis)
Sugammadex 2mg/kg (T2): ~1.5 min to TOFR 0.9
Sugammadex 4mg/kg (T1): ~3 min
Neostigmine: unreliable if TOFR < 0.10
Murphy 2010 · Brull 2017
Predicted time to emergence
min after volatile discontinuation
Pred. BIS
MAC_eff
%
Pain score
/10
PACU
min
Agitation
Five-Gate Emergence Checklist
Gate 1 — Volatile washout
Gate 2 — Opioid respiratory drive
Gate 3 — NMB (TOFR ≥ 0.90)
Gate 4 — CO₂ / ventilatory drive
Gate 5 — N₂O / diffusion hypoxia
Model Comparison — All PK Models Running Simultaneously
All models run in parallel. Range shown = inter-model variability. Use attending judgment when models diverge >20%.
Intraoperative Loop Control
Combined Drug Graph — All Agents + Interactions + Premedications
Kern 2004 RSM · Heyse 2012 · Minto 2000 · Struys 2003 · Eleveld 2018
Not sent to API yet
Case ID: —
Enter Actual Outcomes — trains Bayesian model
Each field you fill updates the self-learning correction model for all future cases. The more fields you fill, the faster the model converges to your patient population.
Bayesian Corrections (live model)
Loading...
Model Accuracy Over Time
Loading...
🏆 Leaderboard — Emergence Quality Index
Loading...
EQI = composite score based on prediction accuracy, pain control, agitation rate, PACU time. Rewards clinical judgment not just case volume.